There is a great deal
of controversy as to whether the benefits of artificial intelligence are worth
the risks that could potentially threaten the very existence of humankind.
Several writers have suggested the possibility that humanoid robots powered by
superior artificial intelligence will eventually replace today’s humans in the
same way that modern humans replaced the Neanderthals. Whilst the threat may be
real in some respects there are some aspects of such a notion that are
completely misconceived.
Firstly, the name artificial intelligence is misleading. What we refer to as
artificial intelligence is no more than augmented human intelligence and our
fears arise from the possibility that it would be unfettered by human
conscience and questions of morality. Artificial intelligence did not create
itself, it is a creation of the human intelligence that produced the algorithms
or many algorithms involved. This wouldn’t be a problem if the human brain
worked exactly like a modern computer or even a quantum computer, but
unfortunately it doesn’t .
Humans sometimes behave in a way that appears to defy logic. This may be
referred to as perversity, doing the very opposite of what would logically be
considered the right course of action. There are many examples of situations in
which humans have sacrificed themselves contrary to their own instincts for
survival. Humans are also noted for making intuitive decisions which are hard
to understand from a logical viewpoint and yet many have proved critical to
human advancement.
Developing an algorithm to control the responses of a humanoid robot under
every possible scenario is very daunting, if not impossible. One solution would
be to include an override to the algorithm that will allow the robot to ‘think
for itself’. To enable this to happen the programmer would need to understand
amongst other things, the process of human thinking, human consciousness,
subconscious influences and the impact of emotions.
Assuming that it is possible to overcome all of the challenges involved and
human ingenuity might suggest that we can, it is worth pausing to consider some
of the advantages the humanoid robot we have created has gained over normal
humans. The robot’s capacity for both the storage of information and speed of
retrieval will be vastly superior to that of any human. With the development of
quantum computing this advantage will be enhanced even further.
Communications between robots and between robots and a centralised quantum
computer will increase the efficiency by which individual robots can cooperate
with each other and follow any common purpose. Does such a prospect raise any
cause for concern?
Humanoid robots developed to the full extent of what appears to be possible
will likely be able to rewrite their own algorithms either individually or
collectively. No safeguards that humans may have written into the original
algorithm would now be unable to prevent the humanoid from harming humans. In
the future Humankind may eventually be considered as just a rather difficult
evolutionary step that can now be dispensed with.
Post Views : 31